https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92588 In a stay application concerning disputed Modvat credit on capital goods and inputs, including claims under Rule 57Q and an alternative claim under Rule 57A, the tribunal found that the material did not establish a strong prima facie case for complete waiver of pre-deposit. It also considered the Revenue's objection over shortage in transit, but granted only conditional relief in the circumstances. Full waiver was refused; the applicants were required to deposit 50% of the duty within eight weeks, and upon compliance the balance duty and penalty were stayed during pendency of the appeal. en-us Wed, 27 Oct 1999 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 02 Nov 2011 16:47:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92588 In a stay application concerning disputed Modvat credit on capital goods and inputs, including claims under Rule 57Q and an alternative claim under Rule 57A, the tribunal found that the material did not establish a strong prima facie case for complete waiver of pre-deposit. It also considered the Revenue's objection over shortage in transit, but granted only conditional relief in the circumstances. Full waiver was refused; the applicants were required to deposit 50% of the duty within eight weeks, and upon compliance the balance duty and penalty were stayed during pendency of the appeal. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 27 Oct 1999 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92588