<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (10) TMI 261 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92579</link>
    <description>Penalty for removal of inputs without following the prescribed Modvat procedure was considered reducible where credit had been reversed before the show cause notice and the surrounding circumstances had already been taken into account. Fiscal penalties were treated as civil in nature, and the quantum was to remain corrective rather than excessive. On those facts, the reduced penalty was sustained at the modified level.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Oct 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2011 16:20:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=129640" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (10) TMI 261 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92579</link>
      <description>Penalty for removal of inputs without following the prescribed Modvat procedure was considered reducible where credit had been reversed before the show cause notice and the surrounding circumstances had already been taken into account. Fiscal penalties were treated as civil in nature, and the quantum was to remain corrective rather than excessive. On those facts, the reduced penalty was sustained at the modified level.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Oct 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92579</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>