<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (10) TMI 257 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92575</link>
    <description>Notification No. 175/86-C.E. was read to allow full duty exemption on first clearances during a financial year up to the aggregate ceiling of Rs. 30 lakhs, while each tariff item remained subject to a separate limit of Rs. 15 lakhs within that overall cap. The Tribunal followed Supreme Court authority and its own later precedent, and rejected the Revenue&#039;s reliance on a contrary Larger Bench view. The exemption was therefore available to the assessee on the stated basis.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Oct 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2011 16:10:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=129636" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (10) TMI 257 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92575</link>
      <description>Notification No. 175/86-C.E. was read to allow full duty exemption on first clearances during a financial year up to the aggregate ceiling of Rs. 30 lakhs, while each tariff item remained subject to a separate limit of Rs. 15 lakhs within that overall cap. The Tribunal followed Supreme Court authority and its own later precedent, and rejected the Revenue&#039;s reliance on a contrary Larger Bench view. The exemption was therefore available to the assessee on the stated basis.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Oct 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92575</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>