<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (10) TMI 232 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92551</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, Mumbai upheld the Assistant Commissioner&#039;s decision to deny the conversion request of a bill of entry for duty-free import under Notification 13/81 for machinery. The Tribunal found that the delay in seeking conversion, lack of permission from the Development Commissioner, and the importer&#039;s actions leading to demurrage costs supported the revenue interests over export promotion activities, ultimately dismissing the appeal and reinstating the Assistant Commissioner&#039;s order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Oct 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2011 14:12:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=129612" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (10) TMI 232 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92551</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, Mumbai upheld the Assistant Commissioner&#039;s decision to deny the conversion request of a bill of entry for duty-free import under Notification 13/81 for machinery. The Tribunal found that the delay in seeking conversion, lack of permission from the Development Commissioner, and the importer&#039;s actions leading to demurrage costs supported the revenue interests over export promotion activities, ultimately dismissing the appeal and reinstating the Assistant Commissioner&#039;s order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Oct 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92551</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>