<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (10) TMI 231 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92550</link>
    <description>Where the assessee had already made a substantial deposit pursuant to the Commissioner&#039;s order, that deposit was treated as sufficient basis to dispense with any further pre-deposit requirement during the appeal. The condition was waived on the basis that the amount remained with the concerned Commissioner&#039;s office, and recovery of the confirmed duty was stayed pending disposal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Oct 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2011 14:10:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=129611" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (10) TMI 231 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92550</link>
      <description>Where the assessee had already made a substantial deposit pursuant to the Commissioner&#039;s order, that deposit was treated as sufficient basis to dispense with any further pre-deposit requirement during the appeal. The condition was waived on the basis that the amount remained with the concerned Commissioner&#039;s office, and recovery of the confirmed duty was stayed pending disposal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Oct 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92550</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>