<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (10) TMI 226 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92545</link>
    <description>Waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery were granted in a Modvat credit dispute where duty had been paid on the inputs and final products. The Tribunal found that no immediate loss to revenue was shown on a prima facie basis and, on that footing, allowed interim protection during the pendency of the appeals. The disputed credit denial and penalty were therefore not required to be deposited pending final adjudication, and recovery was stayed until the appeals were decided.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Oct 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2011 13:55:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=129606" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (10) TMI 226 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92545</link>
      <description>Waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery were granted in a Modvat credit dispute where duty had been paid on the inputs and final products. The Tribunal found that no immediate loss to revenue was shown on a prima facie basis and, on that footing, allowed interim protection during the pendency of the appeals. The disputed credit denial and penalty were therefore not required to be deposited pending final adjudication, and recovery was stayed until the appeals were decided.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Oct 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92545</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>