<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (10) TMI 225 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92544</link>
    <description>An order insisting on full pre-deposit was set aside because the assessee&#039;s submissions and the relevance of Board instructions were not properly considered. The original adjudication was found to have ignored the defence and failed to examine the legal position applicable to the claim for Modvat credit, while the appellate authority had acted mechanically instead of curing that lack of application of mind. The matter was remanded to the jurisdictional adjudicating authority for fresh adjudication, with a direction to hear the assessee and pass a reasoned speaking order after considering the instructions relied upon and the applicable law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Oct 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2011 13:54:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=129605" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (10) TMI 225 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92544</link>
      <description>An order insisting on full pre-deposit was set aside because the assessee&#039;s submissions and the relevance of Board instructions were not properly considered. The original adjudication was found to have ignored the defence and failed to examine the legal position applicable to the claim for Modvat credit, while the appellate authority had acted mechanically instead of curing that lack of application of mind. The matter was remanded to the jurisdictional adjudicating authority for fresh adjudication, with a direction to hear the assessee and pass a reasoned speaking order after considering the instructions relied upon and the applicable law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Oct 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92544</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>