<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (10) TMI 205 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92525</link>
    <description>Flat bed screens made from textile material treated with photosensitive chemicals were treated as printing plates, not textile articles. On that basis, they were classifiable under Heading 84.42 rather than Heading 59.09 of the Central Excise Tariff. The classification adopted by the Collector (Appeals) was therefore upheld, and the consequential benefit of Notification No. 201/87-C.E. remained available.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Oct 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2011 12:37:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=129586" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (10) TMI 205 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92525</link>
      <description>Flat bed screens made from textile material treated with photosensitive chemicals were treated as printing plates, not textile articles. On that basis, they were classifiable under Heading 84.42 rather than Heading 59.09 of the Central Excise Tariff. The classification adopted by the Collector (Appeals) was therefore upheld, and the consequential benefit of Notification No. 201/87-C.E. remained available.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Oct 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92525</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>