<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (9) TMI 327 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92504</link>
    <description>In a pre-deposit application under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, the Tribunal waived the pre-deposit and stayed recovery of the disputed demand pending disposal of the appeal. It did so because the issues in the appeal were identical to those in an earlier appeal concerning the same manufacturing process, where unconditional stay had already been granted. The matter was also directed to be listed with the connected appeals for early hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2011 11:34:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=129565" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (9) TMI 327 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92504</link>
      <description>In a pre-deposit application under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, the Tribunal waived the pre-deposit and stayed recovery of the disputed demand pending disposal of the appeal. It did so because the issues in the appeal were identical to those in an earlier appeal concerning the same manufacturing process, where unconditional stay had already been granted. The matter was also directed to be listed with the connected appeals for early hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92504</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>