<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (9) TMI 321 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92498</link>
    <description>PVC armoured cables were held to fall within the expression &quot;capital goods&quot; for Modvat credit under Rule 57Q. The Tribunal applied the Larger Bench ruling in Jawahar Mills Ltd., which had already settled that cables and wires qualify as capital goods for this purpose. On that binding precedent, a narrow reading of the definition was rejected, and PVC armoured cables were treated as eligible for credit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Sep 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2011 11:19:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=129559" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (9) TMI 321 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92498</link>
      <description>PVC armoured cables were held to fall within the expression &quot;capital goods&quot; for Modvat credit under Rule 57Q. The Tribunal applied the Larger Bench ruling in Jawahar Mills Ltd., which had already settled that cables and wires qualify as capital goods for this purpose. On that binding precedent, a narrow reading of the definition was rejected, and PVC armoured cables were treated as eligible for credit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Sep 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92498</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>