https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92482 The delay in filing the appeal was treated as adequately explained where the appellants had continuously corresponded with the department after receiving the Commissioner's order, seeking a speaking order and clarification on the revised capacity and the date of implementation. The appeal was filed only after the reply indicating the remedy of appeal was received. On these facts, the delay was condoned. en-us Thu, 23 Sep 1999 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 01 Nov 2011 18:39:10 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92482 The delay in filing the appeal was treated as adequately explained where the appellants had continuously corresponded with the department after receiving the Commissioner's order, seeking a speaking order and clarification on the revised capacity and the date of implementation. The appeal was filed only after the reply indicating the remedy of appeal was received. On these facts, the delay was condoned. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 23 Sep 1999 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92482