https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92478 Reference jurisdiction was confined to questions of law actually arising from the Tribunal's order, so proposed issues that related to items not dealt with in that order were not entertainable and, where appropriate, were left to rectification proceedings. Questions on ream labels, oxygen gas, soldering stick, dissolved acetylene gas, refractory bricks and cement were rejected because they were either not raised before the Tribunal, covered by binding precedent, or already treated as used in manufacture within the explanation to Rule 57A. As no proposed ground disclosed a referable question of law arising from the impugned order, the reference applications could not be entertained. en-us Thu, 23 Sep 1999 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 01 Nov 2011 18:20:30 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92478 Reference jurisdiction was confined to questions of law actually arising from the Tribunal's order, so proposed issues that related to items not dealt with in that order were not entertainable and, where appropriate, were left to rectification proceedings. Questions on ream labels, oxygen gas, soldering stick, dissolved acetylene gas, refractory bricks and cement were rejected because they were either not raised before the Tribunal, covered by binding precedent, or already treated as used in manufacture within the explanation to Rule 57A. As no proposed ground disclosed a referable question of law arising from the impugned order, the reference applications could not be entertained. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 23 Sep 1999 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92478