https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92477 The Tribunal allowed the appeal in part, setting aside the impugned order regarding duty demand confirmation, penalty imposition, and confiscation of goods. It directed examination of Modvat credit eligibility and granted abatement based on rules. The Tribunal also allowed reworking of assessable value and verification of duty payment on seized goods. The appellant was given two months to provide evidence for contentions, and the Commissioner was tasked to adjudicate on the matter, with consequential relief to follow. en-us Wed, 22 Sep 1999 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 01 Nov 2011 18:19:25 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92477 The Tribunal allowed the appeal in part, setting aside the impugned order regarding duty demand confirmation, penalty imposition, and confiscation of goods. It directed examination of Modvat credit eligibility and granted abatement based on rules. The Tribunal also allowed reworking of assessable value and verification of duty payment on seized goods. The appellant was given two months to provide evidence for contentions, and the Commissioner was tasked to adjudicate on the matter, with consequential relief to follow. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 22 Sep 1999 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92477