<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (9) TMI 299 - CEGAT, CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92476</link>
    <description>The Revenue appealed against the exclusion of the value of bought-out items from the final product&#039;s value by the Additional Commissioner of Central Excise. The dispute revolved around calculating duty on the excess value of clearances after deducting the value of bought-out items. The Department&#039;s appeal was rejected as it deviated from the original show cause notice, and the decision was based on the investigation report from jurisdictional Central Excise Officers regarding the clearance figures of bought-out items.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Sep 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2011 18:17:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=129537" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (9) TMI 299 - CEGAT, CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92476</link>
      <description>The Revenue appealed against the exclusion of the value of bought-out items from the final product&#039;s value by the Additional Commissioner of Central Excise. The dispute revolved around calculating duty on the excess value of clearances after deducting the value of bought-out items. The Department&#039;s appeal was rejected as it deviated from the original show cause notice, and the decision was based on the investigation report from jurisdictional Central Excise Officers regarding the clearance figures of bought-out items.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Sep 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92476</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>