https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92472 A Tribunal will not ordinarily modify a cash pre-deposit direction by allowing bank guarantees where no sufficient justification is shown, especially where bank guarantees may create administrative and encashment difficulties. Applying that approach, the request to substitute the ordered cash deposit with bank guarantees was rejected. Because the pre-deposit order was not complied with, the connected appeals could not be entertained further and were dismissed for non-compliance. en-us Wed, 22 Sep 1999 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 01 Nov 2011 17:58:21 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92472 A Tribunal will not ordinarily modify a cash pre-deposit direction by allowing bank guarantees where no sufficient justification is shown, especially where bank guarantees may create administrative and encashment difficulties. Applying that approach, the request to substitute the ordered cash deposit with bank guarantees was rejected. Because the pre-deposit order was not complied with, the connected appeals could not be entertained further and were dismissed for non-compliance. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 22 Sep 1999 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92472