<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (9) TMI 279 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92456</link>
    <description>Playing cards were treated as exempt from duty for the period March 1986 to March 1989 under the relevant exemption notification, so the duty demand for that span could not be sustained. The three units were nevertheless found to have common management, common brand use, shared raw materials and coordinated control, showing no real independent identity; their clearances were therefore clubbed for small scale industry exemption purposes, and the extended period of limitation was upheld. In consequence, penalties and fine were reduced in part, while the remaining duty liability and the clubbing finding were maintained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Sep 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 18:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=129517" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (9) TMI 279 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92456</link>
      <description>Playing cards were treated as exempt from duty for the period March 1986 to March 1989 under the relevant exemption notification, so the duty demand for that span could not be sustained. The three units were nevertheless found to have common management, common brand use, shared raw materials and coordinated control, showing no real independent identity; their clearances were therefore clubbed for small scale industry exemption purposes, and the extended period of limitation was upheld. In consequence, penalties and fine were reduced in part, while the remaining duty liability and the clubbing finding were maintained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Sep 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92456</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>