<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (9) TMI 250 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92427</link>
    <description>Disputed industrial items were treated as eligible capital goods for Modvat credit under Rule 57Q because the Tribunal applied earlier decisions, including the Larger Bench ruling in Jawahar Mills and connected authorities, which had already recognised similar goods for that purpose. On that reasoning, the assessee was entitled to credit and the departmental appeals failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2011 15:42:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=129488" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (9) TMI 250 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92427</link>
      <description>Disputed industrial items were treated as eligible capital goods for Modvat credit under Rule 57Q because the Tribunal applied earlier decisions, including the Larger Bench ruling in Jawahar Mills and connected authorities, which had already recognised similar goods for that purpose. On that reasoning, the assessee was entitled to credit and the departmental appeals failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92427</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>