<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (9) TMI 243 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92421</link>
    <description>Eligibility for SSI exemption under Notification No. 175/86-C.E. turned on disputed ownership and use of the brand name &quot;Kwality&quot;, because Clause 7 could exclude units using another manufacturer&#039;s exclusive brand. Fresh evidence had been relied on, and the controversy was the same as an earlier matter in which the Tribunal had permitted additional material and remanded for reconsideration. The original authority was therefore required to re-examine the exemption claim de novo, and the denial of exemption was not finally upheld on the existing record; the matter was remanded for fresh adjudication.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Sep 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2011 15:28:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=129482" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (9) TMI 243 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92421</link>
      <description>Eligibility for SSI exemption under Notification No. 175/86-C.E. turned on disputed ownership and use of the brand name &quot;Kwality&quot;, because Clause 7 could exclude units using another manufacturer&#039;s exclusive brand. Fresh evidence had been relied on, and the controversy was the same as an earlier matter in which the Tribunal had permitted additional material and remanded for reconsideration. The original authority was therefore required to re-examine the exemption claim de novo, and the denial of exemption was not finally upheld on the existing record; the matter was remanded for fresh adjudication.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Sep 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92421</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>