<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (9) TMI 242 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92420</link>
    <description>Thinners manufactured from toluene, benzene and similar inputs were held to fall within the expression &quot;allied materials&quot; in Notification No. 75/84-C.E. for the paints industry. The Tribunal applied its earlier view that thinners are covered by that expression, so exemption is available where the goods answer that description. The factual distinction raised by the Revenue did not alter the legal coverage under the notification, and the assessee was entitled to the benefit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Sep 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2011 15:25:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=129481" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (9) TMI 242 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92420</link>
      <description>Thinners manufactured from toluene, benzene and similar inputs were held to fall within the expression &quot;allied materials&quot; in Notification No. 75/84-C.E. for the paints industry. The Tribunal applied its earlier view that thinners are covered by that expression, so exemption is available where the goods answer that description. The factual distinction raised by the Revenue did not alter the legal coverage under the notification, and the assessee was entitled to the benefit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Sep 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92420</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>