<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (9) TMI 236 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92415</link>
    <description>The appeal was dismissed by the Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, New Delhi due to a 42-day delay in filing, with the explanation for the delay deemed unsatisfactory. The medical certificate provided did not cover the entire period claimed for illness, resulting in the dismissal of the appeal, COD application, and Stay application as time-barred.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2011 15:15:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=129476" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (9) TMI 236 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92415</link>
      <description>The appeal was dismissed by the Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, New Delhi due to a 42-day delay in filing, with the explanation for the delay deemed unsatisfactory. The medical certificate provided did not cover the entire period claimed for illness, resulting in the dismissal of the appeal, COD application, and Stay application as time-barred.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92415</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>