<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (8) TMI 253 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92381</link>
    <description>Pre-deposit for stay of recovery was reduced on the basis of the applicant&#039;s financial hardship and the Department&#039;s reliance on search-based indicia, including a telephone number found in the driver&#039;s cabin and slips and a cash book recovered from a relative&#039;s vehicle suggesting dealings in Chinese silk yarn. The Tribunal balanced the evidentiary material against the applicant&#039;s inability to pay and directed a reduced deposit of Rs. 10,000 by the specified date. On compliance, the balance pre-deposit stood waived and recovery of the remaining penalty was stayed during the appeal; non-compliance would result in dismissal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Aug 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2011 12:26:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=129442" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (8) TMI 253 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92381</link>
      <description>Pre-deposit for stay of recovery was reduced on the basis of the applicant&#039;s financial hardship and the Department&#039;s reliance on search-based indicia, including a telephone number found in the driver&#039;s cabin and slips and a cash book recovered from a relative&#039;s vehicle suggesting dealings in Chinese silk yarn. The Tribunal balanced the evidentiary material against the applicant&#039;s inability to pay and directed a reduced deposit of Rs. 10,000 by the specified date. On compliance, the balance pre-deposit stood waived and recovery of the remaining penalty was stayed during the appeal; non-compliance would result in dismissal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Aug 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92381</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>