https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92368 Refund consequential to a Tribunal's appellate direction was to be implemented promptly where the duty/cess had been deposited under a stay order, leaving no basis for unjust enrichment. The Tribunal directed the Commissioner to give effect to the refund within a fortnight of receipt of the order. It also required the Commissioner or concerned Assistant Commissioner to personally appear and explain any non-compliance if the refund was not implemented, with the matter listed for verification of departmental compliance. en-us Mon, 14 Jun 1999 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 01 Nov 2011 11:24:24 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92368 Refund consequential to a Tribunal's appellate direction was to be implemented promptly where the duty/cess had been deposited under a stay order, leaving no basis for unjust enrichment. The Tribunal directed the Commissioner to give effect to the refund within a fortnight of receipt of the order. It also required the Commissioner or concerned Assistant Commissioner to personally appear and explain any non-compliance if the refund was not implemented, with the matter listed for verification of departmental compliance. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 14 Jun 1999 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92368