<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (3) TMI 287 - CEGAT, CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92361</link>
    <description>An appellate order that merely endorses the original duty demand and penalty, without discussing the assessee&#039;s defence or the reasons for accepting the earlier findings, is unsustainable for want of proper consideration of the material submissions. The failure to address the disputed issues and explain the basis of the conclusion vitiated the appellate disposal. The matter was therefore remanded to the Commissioner (Appeals) for fresh reconsideration after giving the assessee an opportunity to present its case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2011 11:07:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=129422" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (3) TMI 287 - CEGAT, CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92361</link>
      <description>An appellate order that merely endorses the original duty demand and penalty, without discussing the assessee&#039;s defence or the reasons for accepting the earlier findings, is unsustainable for want of proper consideration of the material submissions. The failure to address the disputed issues and explain the basis of the conclusion vitiated the appellate disposal. The matter was therefore remanded to the Commissioner (Appeals) for fresh reconsideration after giving the assessee an opportunity to present its case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92361</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>