https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92360 An appeal was rejected solely for failure to make the ordered pre-deposit, while the appellant's request for reduction of the stay amount on grounds of financial difficulty had not been examined by the Commissioner (Appeals). The matter therefore required fresh consideration at the appellate stage on whether the pre-deposit could be varied. The appeal was remanded, and the Commissioner (Appeals) was directed to reconsider the application for reduction of pre-deposit and pass an appropriate order. en-us Thu, 25 Mar 1999 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 01 Nov 2011 10:58:42 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92360 An appeal was rejected solely for failure to make the ordered pre-deposit, while the appellant's request for reduction of the stay amount on grounds of financial difficulty had not been examined by the Commissioner (Appeals). The matter therefore required fresh consideration at the appellate stage on whether the pre-deposit could be varied. The appeal was remanded, and the Commissioner (Appeals) was directed to reconsider the application for reduction of pre-deposit and pass an appropriate order. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 25 Mar 1999 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92360