<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (5) TMI 258 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92349</link>
    <description>Cash discount offered for payment within the stipulated period remained admissible as a deduction from assessable value where the scheme was known to trade and available to buyers who satisfied the condition. Occasional extension of the same discount to buyers who did not meet the payment condition did not change the character of the discount or make it inadmissible. The practical effect is that a conditional cash discount may still be deducted when its core trade practice and eligibility basis are established.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 May 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2011 18:50:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=129410" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (5) TMI 258 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92349</link>
      <description>Cash discount offered for payment within the stipulated period remained admissible as a deduction from assessable value where the scheme was known to trade and available to buyers who satisfied the condition. Occasional extension of the same discount to buyers who did not meet the payment condition did not change the character of the discount or make it inadmissible. The practical effect is that a conditional cash discount may still be deducted when its core trade practice and eligibility basis are established.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 May 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92349</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>