<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (4) TMI 362 - CEGAT, CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92348</link>
    <description>D.W. tarpaulin bags with polyliner under sub-heading 6301.00 were considered for concessional duty under Notification No. 65/87-C.E. The text states that the issue had already been settled by the Calcutta High Court and followed in earlier Tribunal rulings, so it was treated as no longer res integra. On that basis, the exemption benefit was held available and the adverse order was set aside with consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2011 18:48:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=129409" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (4) TMI 362 - CEGAT, CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92348</link>
      <description>D.W. tarpaulin bags with polyliner under sub-heading 6301.00 were considered for concessional duty under Notification No. 65/87-C.E. The text states that the issue had already been settled by the Calcutta High Court and followed in earlier Tribunal rulings, so it was treated as no longer res integra. On that basis, the exemption benefit was held available and the adverse order was set aside with consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92348</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>