https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92347 An adjudication order was vitiated where a corrigendum invoking Sections 11AB and 11AC of the Central Excise Act was served on the assessee only with the order itself, because the noticee had no meaningful opportunity to respond to the corrigendum. The authority's reliance on an alleged failure to reply within time was inconsistent with natural justice. The impugned order was set aside and the matter remanded for fresh adjudication after hearing the appellants. en-us Fri, 03 Apr 1998 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 31 Oct 2011 18:45:46 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92347 An adjudication order was vitiated where a corrigendum invoking Sections 11AB and 11AC of the Central Excise Act was served on the assessee only with the order itself, because the noticee had no meaningful opportunity to respond to the corrigendum. The authority's reliance on an alleged failure to reply within time was inconsistent with natural justice. The impugned order was set aside and the matter remanded for fresh adjudication after hearing the appellants. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 03 Apr 1998 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92347