<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (12) TMI 455 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92342</link>
    <description>Where Modvat credit is available on inputs, duty paid on raw materials and components is not includible in the assessable value of the finished excisable goods. The Tribunal followed the Larger Bench ruling in Dai Ichi Karkaria and later decisions, and rejected the Department&#039;s contrary argument because that line of contention had already been considered and negatived. The valuation adopted by the Collector (Appeals) was therefore sustained, and the departmental challenge failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2011 18:32:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=129403" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (12) TMI 455 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92342</link>
      <description>Where Modvat credit is available on inputs, duty paid on raw materials and components is not includible in the assessable value of the finished excisable goods. The Tribunal followed the Larger Bench ruling in Dai Ichi Karkaria and later decisions, and rejected the Department&#039;s contrary argument because that line of contention had already been considered and negatived. The valuation adopted by the Collector (Appeals) was therefore sustained, and the departmental challenge failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92342</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>