<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (8) TMI 242 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92329</link>
    <description>A gold bonds scheme did not require the bank to issue bonds merely on filing an application; tender of the gold remained a prescribed step before issuance, and no duty arose where the gold was not available for tender when the application was made. A writ challenge to a customs show cause notice was also premature because the notice only called for an explanation on proposed confiscation, leaving the petitioners free to raise objections before the customs authorities and seek remedy after any final order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2011 17:52:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=129390" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (8) TMI 242 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92329</link>
      <description>A gold bonds scheme did not require the bank to issue bonds merely on filing an application; tender of the gold remained a prescribed step before issuance, and no duty arose where the gold was not available for tender when the application was made. A writ challenge to a customs show cause notice was also premature because the notice only called for an explanation on proposed confiscation, leaving the petitioners free to raise objections before the customs authorities and seek remedy after any final order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92329</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>