<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (10) TMI 172 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92315</link>
    <description>A fresh classification case could not be raised at the appellate stage when it departed from the basis of the show cause notice, because the assessee had no opportunity to meet the new tariff heading. The statutory procedure required notice before introducing a different classification theory, and the appellate record showed a new case beyond the original notice. The fresh plea was therefore not maintainable, and the appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Oct 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2011 17:16:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=129376" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (10) TMI 172 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92315</link>
      <description>A fresh classification case could not be raised at the appellate stage when it departed from the basis of the show cause notice, because the assessee had no opportunity to meet the new tariff heading. The statutory procedure required notice before introducing a different classification theory, and the appellate record showed a new case beyond the original notice. The fresh plea was therefore not maintainable, and the appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Oct 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92315</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>