<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (10) TMI 166 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92309</link>
    <description>Fabrics woven on normal looms and later perforated and cut were not classifiable as narrow woven fabrics under Chapter Heading 58.06 because that heading required a width not exceeding 30 cms and selvedges on both edges. No evidence showed that the goods had selvedges, woven or otherwise formed, on either side, so the essential condition for Heading 58.06 was not met. They were therefore correctly classifiable under Chapter Heading 52.05.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Oct 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2011 16:56:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=129370" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (10) TMI 166 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92309</link>
      <description>Fabrics woven on normal looms and later perforated and cut were not classifiable as narrow woven fabrics under Chapter Heading 58.06 because that heading required a width not exceeding 30 cms and selvedges on both edges. No evidence showed that the goods had selvedges, woven or otherwise formed, on either side, so the essential condition for Heading 58.06 was not met. They were therefore correctly classifiable under Chapter Heading 52.05.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Oct 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92309</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>