<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (10) TMI 164 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92307</link>
    <description>The case involved the revocation of a temporary license for a Custom House Agent due to failure to meet minimum business requirements. The appellant sought renewal, acknowledging the shortfall and promising compliance. The Commissioner revoked the license despite this. The judgment focused on Regulation 8, allowing extensions for regular license qualification. It criticized the delayed notice and highlighted the appellant&#039;s compliance and eligibility for a regular license. The decision set aside the revocation, emphasizing the need for a fair reassessment by the Commissioner. The appeal was allowed, stressing adherence to legal procedures and fair treatment in licensing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Oct 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2011 16:45:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=129368" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (10) TMI 164 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92307</link>
      <description>The case involved the revocation of a temporary license for a Custom House Agent due to failure to meet minimum business requirements. The appellant sought renewal, acknowledging the shortfall and promising compliance. The Commissioner revoked the license despite this. The judgment focused on Regulation 8, allowing extensions for regular license qualification. It criticized the delayed notice and highlighted the appellant&#039;s compliance and eligibility for a regular license. The decision set aside the revocation, emphasizing the need for a fair reassessment by the Commissioner. The appeal was allowed, stressing adherence to legal procedures and fair treatment in licensing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Oct 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92307</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>