<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (10) TMI 159 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92302</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the penalty imposed under Section 112 of the Act on the appellant for the unauthorised importation of 72 used and second-hand diesel engines, amounting to Rs. 6 lakhs. Despite the appellant&#039;s claims of innocence and victimization due to being misled by Arvind Patel, the Tribunal found no grounds to interfere and dismissed the appeal, emphasizing the appellant&#039;s involvement in the transactions and the lack of evidence supporting a mistaken supply of goods.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Oct 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2011 16:25:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=129363" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (10) TMI 159 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92302</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the penalty imposed under Section 112 of the Act on the appellant for the unauthorised importation of 72 used and second-hand diesel engines, amounting to Rs. 6 lakhs. Despite the appellant&#039;s claims of innocence and victimization due to being misled by Arvind Patel, the Tribunal found no grounds to interfere and dismissed the appeal, emphasizing the appellant&#039;s involvement in the transactions and the lack of evidence supporting a mistaken supply of goods.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Oct 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92302</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>