<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (10) TMI 145 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92288</link>
    <description>Rebate of central excise duty on exported goods was to be computed by reference to the duty actually paid on the goods under Rule 12 of the Central Excise Rules, not by substituting the FOB value of the exports. The Tribunal noted that no material showed any prescribed FOB-based computation for the relevant period, and no basis existed for treating FOB value as the measure of duty paid. In the absence of a legal foundation for that substitution, the departmental appeal order could not stand, and the exporter was entitled to rebate on the duty actually paid.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Oct 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2011 15:38:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=129349" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (10) TMI 145 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92288</link>
      <description>Rebate of central excise duty on exported goods was to be computed by reference to the duty actually paid on the goods under Rule 12 of the Central Excise Rules, not by substituting the FOB value of the exports. The Tribunal noted that no material showed any prescribed FOB-based computation for the relevant period, and no basis existed for treating FOB value as the measure of duty paid. In the absence of a legal foundation for that substitution, the departmental appeal order could not stand, and the exporter was entitled to rebate on the duty actually paid.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Oct 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92288</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>