https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92277 Anti-dumping liability under Rule 18 arises only when the Central Government imposes duty by notification after the Designated Authority's final findings. Because no such notification had yet been issued, the final determination had not created any adverse legal consequence for the appellants, and they were not treated as aggrieved at that stage. The challenge to the final findings was therefore premature, and the correctness of those findings was not required to be examined before issuance of a duty notification. The appeals were held not maintainable at that stage and dismissed. en-us Wed, 29 Sep 1999 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 31 Oct 2011 14:45:02 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92277 Anti-dumping liability under Rule 18 arises only when the Central Government imposes duty by notification after the Designated Authority's final findings. Because no such notification had yet been issued, the final determination had not created any adverse legal consequence for the appellants, and they were not treated as aggrieved at that stage. The challenge to the final findings was therefore premature, and the correctness of those findings was not required to be examined before issuance of a duty notification. The appeals were held not maintainable at that stage and dismissed. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 29 Sep 1999 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92277