https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92270 Central excise duty demand was not wholly barred by limitation under Section 11A. Applying the relevant six-month period to the facts, clearances made in December 1982, January 1983 and February 1983 were found to fall within time, so the earlier view treating the entire demand as time-barred was incorrect to that extent. The Revenue's challenge succeeded in part, limited to the portion of the demand relating to those in-time clearances. en-us Mon, 27 Sep 1999 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 31 Oct 2011 14:10:21 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92270 Central excise duty demand was not wholly barred by limitation under Section 11A. Applying the relevant six-month period to the facts, clearances made in December 1982, January 1983 and February 1983 were found to fall within time, so the earlier view treating the entire demand as time-barred was incorrect to that extent. The Revenue's challenge succeeded in part, limited to the portion of the demand relating to those in-time clearances. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 27 Sep 1999 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92270