<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (9) TMI 206 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92266</link>
    <description>The phrase &quot;immediately before&quot; in Rule 57H(3) of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 was construed harmoniously with the credit-transfer scheme under Rule 56A. Unutilised proforma credit could not be denied transfer to the Modvat account merely because it had remained unused for a long period, as no prohibition existed in the rules on that basis. The assessee was therefore entitled to transfer the credit, and the denial of the benefit was incorrect.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Sep 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2011 14:03:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=129327" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (9) TMI 206 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92266</link>
      <description>The phrase &quot;immediately before&quot; in Rule 57H(3) of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 was construed harmoniously with the credit-transfer scheme under Rule 56A. Unutilised proforma credit could not be denied transfer to the Modvat account merely because it had remained unused for a long period, as no prohibition existed in the rules on that basis. The assessee was therefore entitled to transfer the credit, and the denial of the benefit was incorrect.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Sep 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92266</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>