https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92262 Exemption under Notification No. 202/88-C.E. was held, on a prima facie view, not to justify waiver of pre-deposit or stay of recovery, because the Tribunal considered the Revenue's case stronger and followed its earlier ruling in M/s. Glorious Industries that the notification did not extend to pipes and tubes made out of bars. The stay application was therefore rejected, but conditional relief was granted by directing deposit of the disputed duty by 31-10-1999. Non-compliance was warned to result in dismissal of the appeal without further notice. en-us Thu, 23 Sep 1999 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 31 Oct 2011 13:58:36 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92262 Exemption under Notification No. 202/88-C.E. was held, on a prima facie view, not to justify waiver of pre-deposit or stay of recovery, because the Tribunal considered the Revenue's case stronger and followed its earlier ruling in M/s. Glorious Industries that the notification did not extend to pipes and tubes made out of bars. The stay application was therefore rejected, but conditional relief was granted by directing deposit of the disputed duty by 31-10-1999. Non-compliance was warned to result in dismissal of the appeal without further notice. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 23 Sep 1999 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92262