<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (9) TMI 196 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92256</link>
    <description>Reading the tariff entry with Notification No. 87/89-C.E., television receivers with additional computer-like features were treated as covered by the relevant serial entry. The extra features were regarded as ancillary and not sufficient to change the basic character of the goods as television receivers. The notification was construed as including various television receiver combinations, and the Revenue&#039;s narrower reading was rejected with support from earlier Tribunal reasoning. On that basis, the applicants established a strong prima facie case, and unconditional waiver of pre-deposit with stay of recovery was granted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Sep 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2011 13:21:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=129317" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (9) TMI 196 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92256</link>
      <description>Reading the tariff entry with Notification No. 87/89-C.E., television receivers with additional computer-like features were treated as covered by the relevant serial entry. The extra features were regarded as ancillary and not sufficient to change the basic character of the goods as television receivers. The notification was construed as including various television receiver combinations, and the Revenue&#039;s narrower reading was rejected with support from earlier Tribunal reasoning. On that basis, the applicants established a strong prima facie case, and unconditional waiver of pre-deposit with stay of recovery was granted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Sep 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92256</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>