<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (9) TMI 195 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92255</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed by the Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, Mumbai, regarding the classification of pesticides manufactured by the appellant. The impugned order was set aside, and consequential relief was granted, with the agreement that the pesticides should be classified under Heading 38.08 of the Tariff instead of Heading 2942.00.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Sep 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2011 13:13:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=129316" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (9) TMI 195 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92255</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed by the Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, Mumbai, regarding the classification of pesticides manufactured by the appellant. The impugned order was set aside, and consequential relief was granted, with the agreement that the pesticides should be classified under Heading 38.08 of the Tariff instead of Heading 2942.00.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Sep 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92255</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>