<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (9) TMI 192 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92252</link>
    <description>Modvat credit on paper used to manufacture computer stationery was governed by Notification No. 177/86 as amended by Notification No. 149/87, which restricted credit on paper and paper board to Rs. 800 per ton in the specified circumstances. The earlier question whether the final product was exempt under Notification No. 43/86 did not make the credit cap irrelevant, because no prior determination showed that credit was unavailable altogether. In the absence of such a finding, the credit had to be regulated under the applicable notification. The higher credit allowed by the appellate authority was therefore not justified, and the original order limiting credit was restored.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Sep 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2011 13:05:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=129313" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (9) TMI 192 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92252</link>
      <description>Modvat credit on paper used to manufacture computer stationery was governed by Notification No. 177/86 as amended by Notification No. 149/87, which restricted credit on paper and paper board to Rs. 800 per ton in the specified circumstances. The earlier question whether the final product was exempt under Notification No. 43/86 did not make the credit cap irrelevant, because no prior determination showed that credit was unavailable altogether. In the absence of such a finding, the credit had to be regulated under the applicable notification. The higher credit allowed by the appellate authority was therefore not justified, and the original order limiting credit was restored.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Sep 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92252</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>