<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (9) TMI 183 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92244</link>
    <description>Welding electrodes were treated as eligible inputs for Modvat credit under Rule 57A of the Central Excise Rules. The Tribunal followed its earlier consistent orders allowing credit on welding electrodes, and accepted that an input need not be physically present in the final product to qualify. It also treated arc welding electrodes and spot welding electrodes as footing for credit purposes. On that reasoning, Modvat credit was allowed and the departmental appeal failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Sep 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2011 12:32:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=129305" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (9) TMI 183 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92244</link>
      <description>Welding electrodes were treated as eligible inputs for Modvat credit under Rule 57A of the Central Excise Rules. The Tribunal followed its earlier consistent orders allowing credit on welding electrodes, and accepted that an input need not be physically present in the final product to qualify. It also treated arc welding electrodes and spot welding electrodes as footing for credit purposes. On that reasoning, Modvat credit was allowed and the departmental appeal failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Sep 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92244</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>