https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92226 A 393-day delay in filing an appeal against an annual capacity of production determination was not excused because the explanation was inadequate. The applicants relied on the absence of a preamble in the impugned order and on a representation seeking redetermination of capacity, but the order did not confer any right to further representation. As the appeal had to be filed within the statutory period against the determination order, the delay was held inordinate and the appeal time-barred. en-us Mon, 06 Sep 1999 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 31 Oct 2011 11:24:27 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92226 A 393-day delay in filing an appeal against an annual capacity of production determination was not excused because the explanation was inadequate. The applicants relied on the absence of a preamble in the impugned order and on a representation seeking redetermination of capacity, but the order did not confer any right to further representation. As the appeal had to be filed within the statutory period against the determination order, the delay was held inordinate and the appeal time-barred. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 06 Sep 1999 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92226