https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92223 The judgment addressed the confiscation of trucks and silk yarn, with one appellant facing penalties for smuggling silk yarn and the other appellant having their trucks confiscated for transporting contraband goods. The silk yarn was found to be smuggled due to discrepancies in import documents and manipulated stock records, leading to its confiscation under the Customs Act. The first appellant was allowed to redeem the goods by paying a fine, while the confiscation of the trucks owned by the second appellant was reversed as they were not involved in the smuggling operation. en-us Thu, 02 Sep 1999 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 31 Oct 2011 11:10:23 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92223 The judgment addressed the confiscation of trucks and silk yarn, with one appellant facing penalties for smuggling silk yarn and the other appellant having their trucks confiscated for transporting contraband goods. The silk yarn was found to be smuggled due to discrepancies in import documents and manipulated stock records, leading to its confiscation under the Customs Act. The first appellant was allowed to redeem the goods by paying a fine, while the confiscation of the trucks owned by the second appellant was reversed as they were not involved in the smuggling operation. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 02 Sep 1999 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92223