<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (8) TMI 213 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92191</link>
    <description>Deemed Modvat credit under the 1-3-1994 order was treated as admissible for scrap material because the governing notification did not require the inputs to be clearly identifiable as duty paid, and the prior Tribunal view on the same notification was applied. Credit could not be denied merely because the inputs were received before filing the Rule 57H declaration, as the phrase &quot;immediately before&quot; was read as referring to the period preceding the declaration and the scrap was accepted as stock not yet consumed. The co-relation objection was therefore unsustainable, and the entire deemed credit claimed was held allowable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Aug 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2011 13:59:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=129252" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (8) TMI 213 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92191</link>
      <description>Deemed Modvat credit under the 1-3-1994 order was treated as admissible for scrap material because the governing notification did not require the inputs to be clearly identifiable as duty paid, and the prior Tribunal view on the same notification was applied. Credit could not be denied merely because the inputs were received before filing the Rule 57H declaration, as the phrase &quot;immediately before&quot; was read as referring to the period preceding the declaration and the scrap was accepted as stock not yet consumed. The co-relation objection was therefore unsustainable, and the entire deemed credit claimed was held allowable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Aug 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92191</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>