<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (8) TMI 207 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92185</link>
    <description>Plastic moulding housings, mould covers, hubs, locks and rollers were treated as falling under the tariff heading already settled by prior Tribunal rulings. The Tribunal also relied on the Board&#039;s Section 37B order supporting that classification for the relevant plastic goods. Following the earlier decisions and the settled classification position, the same treatment was applied to the goods in the appeal, and the Revenue&#039;s challenge was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Aug 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2011 13:34:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=129246" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (8) TMI 207 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92185</link>
      <description>Plastic moulding housings, mould covers, hubs, locks and rollers were treated as falling under the tariff heading already settled by prior Tribunal rulings. The Tribunal also relied on the Board&#039;s Section 37B order supporting that classification for the relevant plastic goods. Following the earlier decisions and the settled classification position, the same treatment was applied to the goods in the appeal, and the Revenue&#039;s challenge was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Aug 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92185</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>