<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (7) TMI 216 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92154</link>
    <description>Allegations of clandestine production and removal of steel ingots based mainly on electricity-consumption norms and private records were not sufficiently proved. The Tribunal held that, although clandestine removal cases are tested on preponderance of probability, the material must still be reliable, cogent, and adequately corroborated. The impugned order did not clearly establish the necessary links, nor did it properly correlate the private records, octroi receipts, and other materials so as to displace the statutory records and electricity-bill based figures. Mere suspicion, even if strong, cannot substitute for proof, and the demand and penalty were therefore held unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Jul 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2011 11:45:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=129215" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (7) TMI 216 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92154</link>
      <description>Allegations of clandestine production and removal of steel ingots based mainly on electricity-consumption norms and private records were not sufficiently proved. The Tribunal held that, although clandestine removal cases are tested on preponderance of probability, the material must still be reliable, cogent, and adequately corroborated. The impugned order did not clearly establish the necessary links, nor did it properly correlate the private records, octroi receipts, and other materials so as to displace the statutory records and electricity-bill based figures. Mere suspicion, even if strong, cannot substitute for proof, and the demand and penalty were therefore held unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Jul 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92154</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>