<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (7) TMI 209 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92147</link>
    <description>Imported capital goods covered by an export-oriented exemption notification were found to have remained within the factory, with no misuse alleged and no prescribed time limit for duty recovery in the notification. On those facts, the Tribunal treated the demand of customs duty and the redemption fine as unwarranted and set them aside. It also noted the importer&#039;s statement that it was not interested in redeeming the goods, while leaving open liability for duty, penalty or fine if redemption was later pursued.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2011 11:24:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=129208" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (7) TMI 209 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92147</link>
      <description>Imported capital goods covered by an export-oriented exemption notification were found to have remained within the factory, with no misuse alleged and no prescribed time limit for duty recovery in the notification. On those facts, the Tribunal treated the demand of customs duty and the redemption fine as unwarranted and set them aside. It also noted the importer&#039;s statement that it was not interested in redeeming the goods, while leaving open liability for duty, penalty or fine if redemption was later pursued.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92147</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>