<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (7) TMI 206 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92144</link>
    <description>A demand founded entirely on a prior order fixing annual capacity cannot survive once that foundation has been set aside. Duty liability must then be redetermined on the legally applicable basis of actual production under Section 3A(4), with observance of natural justice. The impugned demand was therefore unsustainable and was set aside, and the matter was remitted for fresh determination on that basis.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Jul 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2011 11:15:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=129205" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (7) TMI 206 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92144</link>
      <description>A demand founded entirely on a prior order fixing annual capacity cannot survive once that foundation has been set aside. Duty liability must then be redetermined on the legally applicable basis of actual production under Section 3A(4), with observance of natural justice. The impugned demand was therefore unsustainable and was set aside, and the matter was remitted for fresh determination on that basis.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Jul 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92144</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>