<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (6) TMI 186 - CEGAT, CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92129</link>
    <description>Poly jute bags woven with jute yarn and HDPE tapes remained within the scope of the jute-bag exemption, because the notification used the phrase &quot;made of&quot; without requiring the goods to be wholly, only, or exclusively jute. Classification of the fabric and bags was not in dispute; the decisive point was that the addition of polymer material did not change their essential character as jute bags. Applying the Calcutta High Court&#039;s reasoning on poly-lined jute bags, the text treats the exemption as available where jute remains the dominant material. The assessee was therefore entitled to the concessional rate under Notification No. 65/87-C.E.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Jun 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2011 18:26:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=129190" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (6) TMI 186 - CEGAT, CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92129</link>
      <description>Poly jute bags woven with jute yarn and HDPE tapes remained within the scope of the jute-bag exemption, because the notification used the phrase &quot;made of&quot; without requiring the goods to be wholly, only, or exclusively jute. Classification of the fabric and bags was not in dispute; the decisive point was that the addition of polymer material did not change their essential character as jute bags. Applying the Calcutta High Court&#039;s reasoning on poly-lined jute bags, the text treats the exemption as available where jute remains the dominant material. The assessee was therefore entitled to the concessional rate under Notification No. 65/87-C.E.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Jun 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92129</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>